WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.150 --> 00:00:02.826
A replenishment plan depends on inventory you

2
00:00:02.826 --> 00:00:05.503
can trust. In Doctor’s cycle-count workspace, start

3
00:00:05.503 --> 00:00:08.179
with the package and its market. These

4
00:00:08.179 --> 00:00:10.856
fictional records show different workflow states; they

5
00:00:10.856 --> 00:00:13.532
are separate examples, not one count progressing

6
00:00:13.532 --> 00:00:14.297
on screen.

7
00:00:14.950 --> 00:00:17.573
Open Store Alder’s submitted medical count. For

8
00:00:17.573 --> 00:00:20.197
package DEMO package medical one one, eighteen

9
00:00:20.197 --> 00:00:22.820
units were frozen and fifteen were observed.

10
00:00:22.820 --> 00:00:25.443
That is a three-unit shortage against the

11
00:00:25.443 --> 00:00:28.067
baseline. The record is still submitted, with

12
00:00:28.067 --> 00:00:29.191
its variance unresolved.

13
00:00:29.850 --> 00:00:32.721
This is the manager’s review view. Keep

14
00:00:32.721 --> 00:00:35.593
the package tag, item identifier and license

15
00:00:35.593 --> 00:00:38.464
context together. A difference belongs to a

16
00:00:38.464 --> 00:00:41.335
specific package; combining unrelated packages or medical

17
00:00:41.335 --> 00:00:44.207
and adult-use balances would hide the question

18
00:00:44.207 --> 00:00:45.847
you need to resolve.

19
00:00:46.517 --> 00:00:48.992
Review evidence opens a reason field. Describe

20
00:00:48.992 --> 00:00:51.467
what you found and what needs investigation.

21
00:00:51.467 --> 00:00:53.943
If the observation is uncertain, the submitted-count

22
00:00:53.943 --> 00:00:56.418
view also offers Request recount. This demo

23
00:00:56.418 --> 00:00:58.893
does not save the review or dispatch

24
00:00:58.893 --> 00:01:01.369
a recount, so neither action is claimed

25
00:01:01.369 --> 00:01:01.722
here.

26
00:01:02.383 --> 00:01:05.266
Notice the distinction between Reviewed and Verified.

27
00:01:05.266 --> 00:01:08.148
A separate reviewed example still requires later

28
00:01:08.148 --> 00:01:11.030
METRC verification. Our medical example remains unresolved.

29
00:01:11.030 --> 00:01:13.913
Reviewing an observation is not proof that

30
00:01:13.913 --> 00:01:16.795
a provider balance was corrected, and no

31
00:01:16.795 --> 00:01:18.442
provider correction is demonstrated.

32
00:01:19.117 --> 00:01:21.829
The benefit is a focused investigation: one

33
00:01:21.829 --> 00:01:24.542
package, a visible difference and a reason

34
00:01:24.542 --> 00:01:27.255
to review. Next in the shift: will

35
00:01:27.255 --> 00:01:29.968
a promotion actually help? We will connect

36
00:01:29.968 --> 00:01:32.681
the sales idea to stock coverage and

37
00:01:32.681 --> 00:01:35.393
contribution before treating more volume as a

38
00:01:35.393 --> 00:01:35.781
win.